227
blton Levaninch eine aïnext970 9omentin ægni fisa ore
siw monetreeni te Jupe s devoi and 9206 exctsterd oitto Crud to lust von win I asoned anwonio 989nd Temp! VÄISET NOR avinoş% Bivona si Jung niuns Loovt ni bei ident
་།
A
DOI,ki,
↓
we.
Sh: 80lue 9nd net o'tieg of noqu rell:o
Cellit on eoslq econ ssstevo neelu .jel a z ‚wyeroll he voivee Tognol gives co‚'Isa in Juszezoni Jeni? nid to a mogu beling now To 9019b Iolunce yra ni Mravin bevollen ear oli .eiuda. Laiosye в To colaub Tamil . to favisne end to quitto Jaol and te
•1 to pride'; end no ins,redodo0
OL 10ust ol. .400
bele vidrod
Nevidoezi arix109 ..,801JNİ KİL
*
2 yileuter ba,.isIgzoo „drew eomaniónü qoiblled Jy betray es. e. duine ni ym ale od Tavleous 1 ugen al quickiunosni od aplotsion die „llogh pi maday to doul qe qalb qʼbris on ve bel notum rojton and mà hoah-Iso
9000 32 MI
LAV
„kovo,995 # to equod 813 bersulo josesi...o0. Istiqeoh Mak gaul bod 、eguile en kan ,000 wood alle
24 Joma Janiuger-pid: 9001 3 04 0₫ 1919 gi dem neea imu.
ani. 90%
„namonėjųɛ bolçuovo eut
kur had a net nolelines turn one mi need bw. Ilev obd
!
kentja a old nondo, ny steving ni coethiant. 13 mori Ils
IoT 91. VİP Dlson Lon bi atov Viknector ya 2. od mid poly o
2. od re-dou and to fucqpt on elis. bisvoll .supon sin po di lan,PNINIOH .1. moitio in...hiqmoo,atoedl. vnd to unit # worl
0660. WAR
9. to 0.00
i.
lutong nesu um tio. to
5. Lew and ai melon on 29.150r2
to have men of such a class entering the houses of Chinese citi-
-zens, with or without pretext and free from all control, I
interviewed Howard and told him that he could not be permitted
to repeat such conduct and, as the result of a brief conversa-
-tion, he said he supposed he had better send in his resigna-
-tion. I informed him that I thought it was the best thing he
could do.
He tendered his resignation, but, in such terms that His Excellency declined to accept it and I was
instructed to inform him that he must either withdraw his
letter and make a written apology, whereupon his resignation
would be accepted, or he would be dismissed. I interviewed him
and informed him as instructed and he refund to make any
apology and stated that his letter must stand. He was according- -ly dismissed.
With regard to Howard's petition, I can only
interpret paragraph (3) as an attempt to justify his action in
the matter which led to his resignation and ultimate dismissal.
The line which he adopted both in that case and in others threatened to bring the Department into disrepute.
As regards his allusion to the elaborate
system carried out, it is obvious that, where the entire re-
-construction of a building and numerous other important
matters depend upon what has occurred in the past, it is essenti
-al that everything should be properly recorded and filed. This
is all that is done.
The cases which have been referred to
Government in which Architects have demurred to complying with the notices served relative to dangerous buildings or portions of same are sufficient evidence that this branch of the work
is receiving proper attention. Serious difficulties are how-
-ever created by the action of the Architects referred to. No wholesale condemnation of old buildings can be adopted nor do
such buildings in many cases reveal the serious defecta exist- -ing in them prior to their collapse.
In addition to the inspections made by the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.